Order Description
Assessment 2
Graded: Summative Assessment
Weighting: 30%
Length: 1500 words
Due Date: See the Statement of Assessment Methods or Key Dates for further information.
Submit at: Assessment 2: Appraisal Tools 1500 word limit
Choose one article :
1 Hudson PL Kristjanson LJ Ashby M Kelly B Schofield P Hudson R Aranda S OConnor M Street A. Desire for hastened death in patients with advanced disease and the evidence base of clinical guidelines: a systematic review. Palliat Med. 2006 Oct;20(7):693-701. (available in eJournals)
2 Vasse E Vernooij-Dassen M Spijker A Rikkert MO Koopmans R. A systematic review of communication strategies for people with dementia in residential and nursing homes. Int Psychogeriatr. 2010 Mar;22(2):189-200. Epub 2009 Jul 29. Review. (available in eJournals)
3 Olav Lindqvist Carol Tishelman Carina Lundh Hagelin Jean B. Clark Maria L. Daud Andrew Dickman Franzisca Domeisen Benedetti Maren Galushko Urska Lunder Gunilla Lundquist Guido Miccinesi Sylvia B. Sauter Carl Johan F?rst Birgit H. Rasmussen on behalf of OPCARE9 Complexity in Non-Pharmacological Caregiving Activities at the End of Life: An International Qualitative Study PLOS Medicine / Public Library of Science. 9(2): DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed. 1001173 February 14 2012 (freely available online)?
Now choose ONE check list/appraisal tool for your chosen paper from this site:
https://www.casp-uk.net/ (last accessed 17 May 2016)
1 Justify why you have chosen this particular appraisal tool
2 Answer all questions.
3 Submit your completed appraisal tool into the drop box
Please note: This is an academic paper and should be written from third person perspective.
Elements Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction
Demonstrates knowledge of the pertinent issues involved (30%) Adequate demonstration of knowledge about issue involved. Sound knowledge demonstrated. Advanced knowledge demonstrated. Depth and width of advanced knowledge demonstrated to a high degree combined with original and creative thinking.
Justification of appraisal tool (30%) Superficial discussion of match between article and appraisal tool. Sound discussion of methodological match between article and appraisal tool Wide range of appropriate evidence and discussion of methodological match between article and appraisal tool. Comprehensive discussion of match between article and appraisal tool.
Answers all questions with reference to the literature (30%) Contains statement of opinion with little analysis or supporting evidence.
Opinions argued and backed with analytical logical argument and some evidence. Opinions expressed and backed with analytical logical argument and wide range of appropriate evidence. Opinions expressed clearly and concisely supported by creative analytical and logical argument.
Grammar spelling writing skills referencing (10%) Adequate. Sound use of these enabling clarity of expression. Very good; high level of expression. Excellence in clarity and creativity of written expression.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"